Skip to content
Nordsek
All Business finance guidesBusiness · Guide

Revenue-based financing vs. a term loan: the factor rate, converted

A factor of 1.15 sounds like 15 percent. Repaid over six months from daily sales, it is closer to 60 percent a year. Neither product is wrong; you should just compare them in the same unit.

Jim Forsbom · · 6 min read
Illustration for this guide

Two products

A term loan is credit: a lender advances a sum and you repay it in fixed instalments over a fixed term at an interest rate, usually with a personal guarantee. Revenue-based financing, and its card-sales cousin the merchant cash advance, is not structured as credit. The financier buys a fixed amount of your future revenue at a discount: you receive, say, €50,000 today and hand over €57,500 as a percentage of every day's or week's takings until the amount is reached. There is no interest rate and no fixed term; the repayment speeds up when sales are good and slows when they are not.

The factor rate

The price is quoted as a factor: 1.15 means you repay 1.15 times the advance. That looks like 15 percent, and on a loan over one year it would be. But the money is repaid continuously from the first week, so on average you have only about half the advance outstanding, and it is typically gone within six to nine months. Fifteen percent of the full amount for half the amount over half a year is an annual cost of roughly 55 to 60 percent. The faster your sales, the faster you repay, and the higher the annualised cost, because the fee does not shrink.

Term loan, 24 months at 9 %RBF, factor 1.15, 20 % of revenue
You receive€50,000€50,000
You repay€54,830€57,500
Repaid over24 months, fixedAbout 7 months, variable
Cost in euros€4,830€7,500
Annual cost, comparable9 %About 55 %
Figure 1 — €50,000 for a company with €40,000 monthly revenue. Illustrative; the RBF cost depends entirely on how fast revenue repays it.

How to convert any offer

Take the total you repay minus what you receive: that is the fee in euros. Estimate the months until it is repaid from your revenue and the percentage taken. Then use the rule that applies to any amortising credit: the annual rate is roughly the fee divided by half the advance, divided by the years to repay. For a €7,500 fee on €50,000 over 0.6 years: 7,500 divided by 25,000 divided by 0.6, about 50 percent. A spreadsheet's internal-rate function on the actual cash flows gives the precise figure; the rough rule is enough to see which offer is which.

When revenue-based financing fits

When the money earns more than it costs, quickly. An online shop buying stock for a season it knows will sell, a restaurant financing a refit before summer, a business with a signed order it needs to fund. The advantages are real: approval in days on revenue data alone, no fixed instalment in a slow month, usually no personal guarantee beyond a performance guarantee. The cost is worth paying when the alternative is missing the season. It is not worth paying for working capital that simply covers ongoing losses, because the percentage of revenue taken makes the losses bigger.

When a term loan fits

Whenever you have time and evidence. A term loan is cheaper by a multiple, predictable, and does not take a share of every sale. It suits equipment, vehicles, a second location, or any investment that pays back over years rather than months. The price of that cheapness is the bank's process: accounts or at least a solid track record, a personal guarantee, and weeks rather than days.

Convert everything to an annual cost in euros. A factor is a price tag written in a different language.

The small print that matters

Because revenue-based financing is a sale of receivables rather than a loan, consumer and most business credit rules do not apply. Read what happens if revenue drops sharply: some contracts extend the repayment, others allow the financier to demand the balance. Read whether early repayment reduces the fee; often it does not, which is the opposite of a loan. And read whether the financier takes its share directly from your payment processor, which is convenient until you want to change processor.

Summary

Compare the two on annual cost in euros, not on a factor against an interest rate. Use revenue-based financing for fast, short, high-return needs where speed is the point. Use a term loan for everything that can wait a few weeks. And if the annual cost of the fast money exceeds the return on what it buys, it is not financing; it is a loss.

About the authorJim Forsbom

Co-founder and CEO of Nordsek Oy. Writes about consumer finance and the EU rules behind it; every article is checked against the regulation it cites.

Where we compare

Compare business finance in your country

The English hub explains the rules. The country site shows real offers, in the local language, from providers licensed there.

2countries live
Licensed providers only
Local language, local rules
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

No. A factor is a multiple of the advance, paid regardless of how fast you repay. Because repayment is continuous and short, the annual cost is typically three to five times the factor's percentage.

DiscussionNo comments yet